Insurance Funerals

Get a free consultation

Introduction

As the funeral industry evolves, environmentally conscious end-of-life practices are becoming more popular. One notable method gaining attention is aquamation, also known as alkaline hydrolysis or water cremation. Proponents argue that aquamation is a more sustainable and eco-friendly alternative to traditional flame-based cremation or burial. Despite these claimed benefits, its adoption in the United States has been relatively slow. In this blog post, we’ll explore the barriers hindering aquamation’s widespread acceptance, focusing on public awareness, regulatory inconsistencies, and limited infrastructure.

What is Aquamation?

Aquamation, or alkaline hydrolysis, is a process that uses water, heat, and an alkaline solution (typically potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide) to accelerate the natural decomposition of human remains. Over a period of several hours, the body breaks down in a pressurized stainless-steel chamber, resulting in a sterile liquid and bone fragments, which can then be processed into a fine powder—similar to the remains from a traditional cremation.

Environmental Benefits

  • Lower carbon footprint: Aquamation uses significantly less energy compared to flame-based cremation.
  • Reduced emissions: It emits fewer greenhouse gases and no harmful particulates like mercury.
  • Lower resource consumption: Less fuel and raw materials (e.g., wood, metal caskets) are used in the process.
Source: Cremation Association of North America (CANA)

1. Public Awareness: The Information Gap

Despite growing interest in green funeral options, public awareness about aquamation remains low. Many people have never heard of the process, let alone understand its potential benefits.

Misinformation and Misconceptions

  • Association with “chemical” processes: Words like “alkaline” or “hydrolysis” can sound intimidating, leading some individuals to assume aquamation is harsh or unnatural.
  • Religious and cultural considerations: Some religious or cultural communities may be hesitant to adopt new funeral methods, especially if they are unfamiliar with the science behind it.

How to Improve Awareness

  • Educational campaigns: Funeral homes offering aquamation services can provide brochures, host open houses, and share informative videos.
  • Community outreach: Engaging religious, cultural, and community leaders in open dialogue can demystify aquamation.
  • Media coverage: Press features and online articles can spotlight personal stories of families who chose aquamation, helping normalize the practice.
Source: National Funeral Directors Association (NFDA)

2. Inconsistent Regulations: State-by-State Patchwork

Legal Status Varies

One of the biggest challenges to aquamation adoption is inconsistent or unclear state regulations. Although some states have legalized aquamation, others remain silent on the matter, or have outright bans or moratoriums.
  • States that allow aquamation: As of this writing, states like California, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Nevada, and Oregon have approved alkaline hydrolysis in some capacity. However, each may impose different guidelines for equipment, licensing, and disposal of effluent.
  • States with pending legislation: In some regions, aquamation bills are introduced but can face delays due to legislative priorities or opposition from traditional funeral lobbies.

Navigating Regulatory Hurdles

Because funeral regulations in the United States often fall under state jurisdiction, implementing aquamation can become complex for funeral homes that operate in multiple states or near state lines.
  • Lobbying efforts: Advocacy groups and funeral service associations sometimes work to educate legislators on the environmental and public health benefits of aquamation.
  • National standardization: Many in the industry argue that a more unified federal stance or standardized guidelines could help streamline adoption.
Source: AquamationInfo.com

3. Lack of Infrastructure and Facilities

Another substantial barrier is the limited number of facilities offering aquamation. Even in states where it’s legal, funeral homes may find the startup costs of acquiring aquamation equipment prohibitively expensive.

High Initial Investment

  • Equipment cost: Installing an aquamation system involves purchasing specialized chambers, meeting wastewater disposal requirements, and adhering to safety regulations. These systems can cost significantly more upfront than traditional cremation retorts.
  • Facility space: Some funeral homes lack the physical space required to house the equipment.
  • Ongoing maintenance: Aquamation units need regular maintenance, adding to operational expenses.

Geographic Limitations

  • Sparse rural coverage: In less populated areas, it may be difficult to justify the investment in aquamation facilities due to lower demand.
  • Transportation concerns: If the nearest aquamation facility is hours away, transportation costs can become a barrier, negating some of the eco-friendly benefits.

Potential Solutions

  • Shared facilities: In areas without enough demand to warrant individual aquamation systems, funeral homes could potentially collaborate on shared infrastructure.
  • Legislative incentives: Tax breaks, subsidies, or grants could encourage funeral providers to adopt eco-friendly technologies, lowering the barrier to entry.
Source: Funeral Consumers Alliance

4. Cultural and Emotional Barriers

While not strictly regulatory or infrastructural, cultural and emotional factors play a key role in funeral decisions.
  • Tradition vs. innovation: Many families have deeply ingrained traditions regarding burial or flame-based cremation, making them less open to alternative methods like aquamation.
  • Family dynamics: At a time of grief, some family members might be reluctant to choose an unfamiliar process.
  • Religious viewpoints: Various faith traditions have specific guidelines for handling remains, and aquamation is still under consideration or debate in some religious communities.

Overcoming Emotional Hurdles

  • Transparent explanations: Funeral directors can provide clear, compassionate explanations of aquamation, including how remains are returned to the family.
  • Respectful integration: Offering the same rituals (viewings, memorials) associated with more traditional methods can make aquamation feel more familiar.
Source: Green Burial Council

5. The Future Outlook

Despite these challenges, aquamation is slowly gaining traction. As environmental concerns grow and more states pass supportive legislation, we can expect to see an increase in aquamation facilities and broader acceptance from consumers.

Steps Toward Greater Adoption

  1. Education and awareness: Continued efforts to inform the public, clergy, and medical professionals about the process can help dispel misconceptions.
  2. Regulatory clarity: Ongoing advocacy and legislative efforts to standardize regulations will reduce the patchwork of rules.
  3. Financial incentives: Grants or tax credits for greener funeral technologies could encourage more funeral providers to invest in aquamation systems.
  4. Cultural acceptance: As more families share positive experiences, aquamation will become part of mainstream funeral options.

Conclusion

Aquamation represents a promising, environmentally conscious alternative to traditional funeral practices, but its road to widespread adoption is paved with obstacles—from limited public awareness and regulatory inconsistencies to high infrastructure costs. As awareness grows and states begin to standardize their regulations, we may see aquamation become more readily available. Until then, those interested should research local laws, consult with funeral providers, and weigh the potential environmental, cultural, and financial implications. By understanding these barriers and working toward solutions, the United States can broaden its end-of-life options and embrace a greener path forward.